You are viewing [info]sboydtaylor's journal

Previous Entry | Next Entry

bow
I was reading a story the a few months ago and found myself entranced. Words danced off the page and turned to stick figures and scenes flickered forth from my braincase like a movie projected on silver fog. And what, pray tell, caused this? A fan-fic that my wife wrote, for the TV show Supernatural.

So, of course, I wondered what had caused it? I checked the work for signs of superior craftsmanship. They were everywhere -- cunning word choice, a certian delicacy of phrase -- but didn't seem to be the direct cause. No, the parts that excited me the most were just pure, intoxicating emotion.

At the time the lesson slipped past me. Until today, when I was beta-reading a story for Bill Ledbetter and it happened again. A woman's husband dies, and then BOOM, I'm in a different world. It is her grief and her rage, subtly and convincingly expressed, that makes the story real. Because I've felt that grief, that anger. I know her. I am her.

This, in my opinion, is why Romance is the most popular genre. Because by default it deals with emotion. It HAS to deal with emotions, almost in a pure state.

And emotions are what connect the reader to you. What ties them to you so they can't look away. What forces their eyes to drink down your dark potions and then wish there was more.

If you do not provide emotion -- be it either clumsy and brute-force (think: daytime TV melodrama), or elegantly crafted and understated (think: most of the best books of the century) -- the reader will not follow.

The more real, the more convincing, and the more vivid you make those emotions then the more likely you are to make that connection -- that magical leap from mere story to all-encompassing vision.

So, of course, I'm studying my arse off on this, but as yet all I have are a list of possible techniques, of which you can use all or none and still get a good story:

1) Make accessible characters
- I have ambiguous feelings toward this techniques because every now and again I just like a good anti-hero.

2) Shade every sentence with emotion
- This is the art of word choice and the technical aspect of writing

3) Make the emotional stakes drive your characters
- The stakes of the story have to be something the main character wants. Even if it's just a boy scout who wants to sit on the corner and eat an ice cream cone with his dad, the more he wants this then the more is at stake, and the more the emotional payoff when it comes true (or the tragedy when it doesn't)

4) Keep the emotional logic rolling
- Unfortunately characters in stories can't be easily get away with being as random and mercurial as real-world moods. They can, it just takes a lot of work. But typically jumps from one emotion to the next must be logical transitions. It must happen on the right emotional beat, to the right emotional rhythm. This is where instinct is your only guide.

5) Make the emotional stakes central to the story
- If your main character really hates pistachios and that is his only defining trait, then you will, unfortunately, probably have a story about pistachios on your hands. Unless you're really clever ;)

6) Always remember that emotional reality is the reality of the story -- that conflicts should feed emotions
- Whether they know it or not, the emotions are the drug that your readers are looking for. Feed them. Come back to the emotions. Keep them rumbling, tumbling, changing, and -- most importantly -- tasty. This is why conflict is so important. This is what keeps your characters FEELING.

Anyway, this is a new study for me, one I am only now delving into with intensity. I've always done this by instinct. Now I want to know why what I do works or doesn't work. I'm sure you'll hear more on it in the future.

All comments and thoughts welcome.

Comments

( 5 comments — Leave a comment )
[info]jonathandanz.wordpress.com wrote:
Dec. 8th, 2009 03:35 pm (UTC)
Writing Emotion
Great post. If there is no emotion, there is little chance readers will connect. I find writing emotion a challenge because I don't want it to seem contrived. I ask myself over and over again, "could a person really feel this way? Is this a realistic reaction? Does the dialogue capture the emotion these characters feel?" It feels like a steep learning curve that may never level out, but that's part of the fun, too.
[info]sboydtaylor wrote:
Dec. 8th, 2009 03:43 pm (UTC)
Re: Writing Emotion
This is part of why writing is an art, not a science. To avoid "contrivance", there are three things I watch out for:

1) The emotional beats. Make sure there is enough "time", really "space" in the text, for the person to change. This is easiest when you are inside the character's head and you are thinking like he/she thinks, so you don't have to resort to some vague mathematics of emotion.

2) Make the emotions subtle. Emotions can be shown by the small things in someone acts, by the choice of words you use to describe something. You don't have to add the brute force descriptors (rage, etc.) The main danger here is that you get too clinical.

3) Have the tone of the story support the emotions.
[info]pure_doxyk wrote:
Dec. 8th, 2009 04:45 pm (UTC)
Lord, but I love your meta-writings! This one is really pertinent to me, as I edit my way through The First Finished Novel I Can Stand (please don't ask me how many finished novels I've thrown away, or burned in the backyard...) -- it's a scifi story, pretty usual in its tropes and plot (Evil Corporation Breeds Evil Computer, Rogue Techies Save The World), but it speaks to me because of the characters and the emotions they experience. Still, I don't want to be accused of writing "soap opera" sci-fi, focusing too much on how the people involved relate to each other and evolve as persons. I find myself wanting to "pull back" from intense conversations and "focus on the action" (I like very stripped-down, non-purple and action-driven prose for my scifi). But this reminded me that the two must hang together, like the light and dark sides of duct tape; the action must be infused with the emotions of the characters, and they have to show us their emotions not just when they're engaged in heavy conversations, but also while they're acting out the story.

I'm used to thinking "Every word must drive the story," since it's part of my style of preference for this type of writing. You've reminded me (at a very good time!) that the emotional content of the story must also be reflected holographically in all its parts; that the climax of an emotion is too late to get the audience "into" it. Also, I think that tells me how to work interesting and eloquent language into the story without letting it turn "purple" -- metaphors and clever language that bring out the emotions of the story are neither unnecessary nor showy; they serve an important purpose.

Thanks yet again! (Save these posts for a how-to book, darnit; I'll buy a copy!)
[info]sboydtaylor wrote:
Dec. 8th, 2009 05:49 pm (UTC)
Thanks! I'm glad this was timely for you. As for the novel, congratulations on finishing one you like. Go go go :) Finish it up and send it out.
[info]marshallpayne1 wrote:
Dec. 17th, 2009 02:35 am (UTC)
I got an email saying you sent me an LJ message but I can't find it in my inbox. Here's my gmail addy. *curious*

http://marshallpayne.com/Contact.html

Edited at 2009-12-17 02:35 am (UTC)
( 5 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

May 2012
S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com